RISE looks at recent headlines concerning social determinants of health (SDoH).
Hardships continue one year into the pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted Americans nationwide, and while vaccine rollouts increase across the country, individuals and families continue to struggle with varying outcomes from the past year. The pandemic has exacerbated SDoH and health disparities, particularly in communities of color, causing hardships such as financial distress, unemployment, social isolation, and food insecurity.
- Forty-seven percent of adults said that they or someone in their household had experienced a loss of employment income, and one in five applied for unemployment insurance benefits since March 2020
- More than half of adults (61 percent) surveyed said they had difficulty paying for usual household expenses in the past week and 27 percent used credit cards or loans to meet household spending needs
- More than 7 percent of adults had no confidence in their ability to make next month’s housing payment (both renters and owners) and 11 percent reported food insufficiency in their household
- Thirty percent of adults said they delayed medical care in the last four weeks due to the pandemic and 39 percent reported symptoms of depression or anxiety
KFF also noted the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on communities of color, as Black and Hispanic adults were found to struggle the most in almost all measures:
- More than 75 percent of Black and Hispanic adults said they had difficulty paying household costs compared to 53 percent of white adults
- About 13 percent of Black and Hispanic adults said they have no confidence in their ability to make next month’s housing payment versus the 5 percent of white adults
- More Black adults (20 percent) and Hispanic adults (18 percent) reported food insufficiency in their households than white adults (8 percent)
NIH launches initiative to fund increased access to COVID testing in vulnerable communities
While COVID tests have become readily available to many people, those in underserved communities and communities of color still struggle with access to tests. To address these disparities, the U.S. National Institutes of Health's (NIH) Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics Underserved Populations (RADx-UP) has launched an initiative to fund projects striving to increase access to testing and fill health care gaps throughout vulnerable communities, according to a recent Modern Healthcare article. The RADx-UP program, which falls within NIH’s larger program, RADx, will reveal COVID testing patterns, strengthen health disparities data, and assist health officials in the development of strategies to increase testing, according to Monica Webb Hooper, deputy director of NIH's National Institute on Minority Health and Health disparities.
The RADx-UP program has already funded millions of dollars to organizations expanding COVID-19 testing for vulnerable populations, including a California program addressing COVID testing in underserved and vulnerable communities throughout San Diego; a project at Washington State University aiming to further testing in Native American communities; as well as a project led by University of Utah researchers, SCALE-UP Utah, which is exploring clinic and population health management interventions to increase different forms of testing and examine effectiveness.
Food vouchers found to improve dietary choices among low-income populations
Produce food vouchers have the greatest impact on dietary improvements among urban low-income populations, according to a recent study published by JAMA Network Open. While cities across the United States have implemented produce vouchers, there have been varied outcomes of fruit and vegetable intake across different populations and environments. To better understand these outcomes, researchers compared community-based produce voucher programs in Los Angeles and San Francisco.
The study consisted of 671 adults who were given $20 each month in produce vouchers for six months which they could redeem in neighborhood grocery stores and corner stores. At the end of the six-month programs, researchers found produce intake increased by .22 cups-equivalent of fruits and vegetables among participants.
Interestingly, Los Angeles saw a higher increase in fruit and vegetable intake among participants than San Francisco (.64 cups-equivalent versus .10 cups-equivalent) despite having fewer stores that accepted the produce vouchers (5 stores in Los Angeles versus 29 stores in San Francisco). Researchers attribute the discrepancy to the lower income of the Los Angeles population, noting those with higher income typically purchase their produce prior to receiving their vouchers and then use the food vouchers as a replacement for other out-of-pocket costs. Whereas lower income individuals tend to do the opposite by increasing the quantity of fruits and vegetables they purchase using the vouchers to supplement out-of-pocket costs.
“As funders across the US consider supporting voucher programs, our data suggest that ensuring program benefits reach the lowest-income populations may be associated with higher per dollar outcomes on fruit and vegetable consumption,” wrote the researchers. “There appears to be heterogeneity even among the low-income populations that qualify for voucher programs. Programs often target a full subgroup of people below a given income threshold, but our findings would suggest disproportionate targeting for those with the lowest incomes.”